Usuário:Eduardo P/Oficina de tradução/4

Concepção artística de uma base humana em Marte. No corte, é mostrada uma área de horticultura interna.

A colonização de Marte refere-se à proposta de instalação de assentamentos humanos permanentes no planeta Marte.

Tal proposta é objeto de estudo sério. Depois da Terra, Marte é o planeta mais habitável do sistema solar e tem sido considerado como um dos principais candidatos à colonização humana extensiva e permanente, não apenas por estar mais próximo ao nosso planeta mas também pelas condições da sua superfície - que são mais semelhantes às da Terra, comparativamente a outros planetas do Sistema Solar -, destacando-se, por exemplo, a disponibilidade de águas superficiais, embora congeladas, em Marte. Embora a Lua, devido à sua proximidade, tenha sido proposta como o primeiro local para a colonização humana, a gravidade lunar corresponde apenas a 16% da gravidade da Terra, enquanto a gravidade de Marte é mais substancial: corresponde a 38%. Há mais água presente em Marte do que na Lua, e Marte tem uma atmosfera tênue. Esses fatores dão a Marte maior capacidade potencial de abrigar a vida orgânica e a colonização humana.

A habitação humana permanente, em um corpo planetário que não seja a Terra, é um dos temas mais frequentes na ficção científica. Como a tecnologia tem avançado e as preocupações sobre o futuro da humanidade na Terra têm aumentado, a tese de que a colonização do espaço é uma meta alcançável, válida e ganha impulso. [1][2]

Relative similarity to Earth editar


The Earth is much like its "sister planet" Venus in bulk composition, size and surface gravity, but Mars' similarities to Earth are more compelling when considering colonization. These include:

  • The Martian day (or sol) is very close in duration to Earth's. A solar day on Mars is 24 hours 39 minutes 35.244 seconds. (See timekeeping on Mars.)
  • Mars has a surface area that is 28.4% of Earth's, only slightly less than the amount of dry land on Earth (which is 29.2% of Earth's surface). Mars has half the radius of Earth and only one-tenth the mass. This means that it has a smaller volume (~15%) and lower average density than Earth.
  • Mars has an axial tilt of 25.19°, compared with Earth's 23.44°. As a result, Mars has seasons much like Earth, though they last nearly twice as long because the Martian year is about 1.88 Earth years. The Martian north pole currently points at Cygnus, not Ursa Minor.
  • Mars has an atmosphere. Although it is very thin (about 0.7% of Earth's atmosphere) it provides some protection from solar and cosmic radiation and has been used successfully for aerobraking of spacecraft.
  • Recent observations by NASA's Mars Exploration Rovers, ESA's Mars Express and NASA's Phoenix Lander confirm the presence of water ice on Mars.

Differences from Earth editar

  • While there are kinds of micro-organisms that survive in a great variety of environmental conditions, including some Martian conditions, plants and animals generally cannot survive the ambient conditions on the surface of Mars.[3]
  • The surface gravity on Mars is 38% of that on Earth. It is not known if this is enough to prevent the health problems associated with weightlessness.[4]
  • Mars is much colder than Earth, with a mean surface temperature between 186–268 K (−87 °C to −5 °C).[5][6] The lowest temperature ever recorded on Earth was −89.2 °C, in Antarctica.
  • There are no standing bodies of liquid water on the surface of Mars.
  • Because Mars is further from the Sun, the amount of solar energy reaching the upper atmosphere (the solar constant) is less than half of what reaches the Earth's upper atmosphere or the Moon's surface. However, the solar energy that reaches the surface of Mars is not impeded by a thick atmosphere and magnetosphere like on Earth.
  • Mars' orbit is more eccentric than Earth's, exacerbating temperature and solar constant variations.
  • The atmospheric pressure on Mars is ~6 mbar, far below the Armstrong Limit (61.8 mbar) at which people cannot survive without pressure suits. Since terraforming cannot be expected as a near-term solution, habitable structures on Mars would need to be constructed with pressure vessels similar to spacecraft, capable of containing a pressure between a third and a whole bar.
  • The Martian atmosphere consists mainly of carbon dioxide. Because of this, even with the reduced atmospheric pressure, the partial pressure of CO2 at the surface of Mars is some 15 times higher than on Earth. It also has significant levels of carbon monoxide.
  • Mars has a very weak magnetosphere, so it deflects solar winds poorly.

Conditions for human habitation editar

Based on scientific evidence, collected by satellites and the NASA Rovers, conditions are not "hospitable" to humans or life as we know it. Antarctica has temperatures that are comparable, though Mars is colder, but other environmental circumstances are very unlike those of Earth, in fact would be deadly to most life as we know it. These include greatly reduced air pressure, an atmosphere that's 95% carbon dioxide, almost no oxygen (compared to Earth's 21% oxygen and almost no carbon dioxide), reduced gravity, and no liquid water (although amounts of frozen water have been detected). Despite this, some consider Mars to be "habitable," but only if life support measures were taken. People would need to live in artificial environments. Man might one day step foot on Mars and scout around, but it's unknown if man could ever adapt to living on Mars as a permanent resident.

Terraforming editar

 
An artist's conception of a terraformed Mars (2009)
 Ver artigo principal: Terraforming of Mars

It may be possible to terraform Mars to allow a wide variety of living things, including humans, to survive unaided on Mars' surface.[7]

In April 2012, it was reported that some lichen and cyanobacteria survived and showed remarkable adaptation capacity for photosynthesis after 34 days in simulated Martian conditions in the Mars Simulation Laboratory (MSL) maintained by the German Aerospace Center (DLR).[8][9][10]

Radiation editar

Mars has no global magnetic field comparable to Earth's geomagnetic field. Combined with a thin atmosphere, this permits a significant amount of ionizing radiation to reach the Martian surface. The Mars Odyssey spacecraft carried an instrument, the Mars Radiation Environment Experiment (MARIE), to measure the dangers to humans. MARIE found that radiation levels in orbit above Mars are 2.5 times higher than at the International Space Station. Average doses were about 22 millirads per day (220 micrograys per day or 0.08 gray per year.)[11] A three-year exposure to such levels would be close to the safety limits currently adopted by NASA. Levels at the Martian surface would be somewhat lower and might vary significantly at different locations depending on altitude and local magnetic fields. Building living quarters underground (possibly in lava tubes that are already present) would significantly lower the colonists' exposure to radiation.

Occasional solar proton events (SPEs) produce much higher doses. Some SPEs were observed by MARIE that were not seen by sensors near Earth because SPEs are directional, making it difficult to warn astronauts on Mars early enough.

Much remains to be learned about space radiation. In 2003, NASA's Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center opened a facility, the NASA Space Radiation Laboratory, at Brookhaven National Laboratory that employs particle accelerators to simulate space radiation. The facility studies its effects on living organisms along with shielding techniques.[12] Initially, there was some evidence that this kind of low level, chronic radiation is not quite as dangerous as once thought; and that radiation hormesis occurs.[13] In 2006 it was determined that protons from cosmic radiation actually cause twice as much serious damage to DNA as previously expected, exposing astronauts to grave risks of cancer and other diseases.[14] Because of radiation, the summary report of the Review of U.S. Human Space Flight Plans Committee released on 2009 reported that "Mars is not an easy place to visit with existing technology and without a substantial investment of resources."[14] NASA is exploring alternative technologies such as "deflector" shields of plasma to protect astronauts and spacecraft from radiation.[14]

Transportation editar

Interplanetary spaceflight editar

 
Mars (Viking 1, 1980)

Mars requires less energy per unit mass (delta V) to reach from Earth than any planet except Venus. Using a Hohmann transfer orbit, a trip to Mars requires approximately nine months in space.[15] Modified transfer trajectories that cut the travel time down to seven or six months in space are possible with incrementally higher amounts of energy and fuel compared to a Hohmann transfer orbit, and are in standard use for robotic Mars missions. Shortening the travel time below about six months requires higher delta-v and an exponentially increasing amount of fuel, and is not feasible with chemical rockets, but would be perfectly feasible with advanced spacecraft propulsion technologies, some of which have already been tested, such as VASIMR,[16] and nuclear rockets. In the former case, a trip time of forty days could be attainable,[17] and in the latter, a trip time down to about two weeks.[18] Another possibility is constant-acceleration technologies such as space-proven solar sails and ion drives which permit passage times at close approaches on the order of several weeks.{{carece de fontes}}

During the journey the astronauts are subject to radiation, which requires a means to protect them. Cosmic radiation and solar wind cause DNA damage, which increases the risk of cancer significantly. The effect of long term travel in interplanetary space is unknown, but scientists estimate an added risk of between 1% and 19%, most likely 3.4%, for men to die of cancer because of the radiation during the journey to Mars and back to Earth. For women the probability is higher due to their larger glandular tissues.[19]

Landing on Mars editar

Mars has a gravity 0.38 times that of the Earth and the density of its atmosphere is 1% of that on Earth.[20] The relatively strong gravity and the presence of aerodynamic effects makes it difficult to land heavy, crewed spacecraft with thrusters only, as was done with the Apollo moon landings, yet the atmosphere is too thin for aerodynamic effects to be of much help in braking and landing a large vehicle. Landing piloted missions on Mars will require braking and landing systems different from anything used to land crewed spacecraft on the Moon or robotic missions on Mars.[21]

If one assumes carbon nanotube construction material will be available with a strength of 130 GPa then a space elevator could be built to land people and material on Mars.[22] A space elevator on Phobos has also been proposed.[23]

Communication editar

Communications with Earth are relatively straightforward during the half-sol when the Earth is above the Martian horizon. NASA and ESA included communications relay equipment in several of the Mars orbiters, so Mars already has communications satellites. While these will eventually wear out, additional orbiters with communication relay capability are likely to be launched before any colonization expeditions are mounted.

The one-way communication delay due to the speed of light ranges from about 3 minutes at closest approach (approximated by perihelion of Mars minus aphelion of Earth) to 22 minutes at the largest possible superior conjunction (approximated by aphelion of Mars plus aphelion of Earth). Real-time communication, such as telephone conversations or Internet Relay Chat, between Earth and Mars would be highly impractical due to the long time lags involved. NASA has found that direct communication can be blocked for about two weeks every synodic period, around the time of superior conjunction when the Sun is directly between Mars and Earth,[24] although the actual duration of the communications blackout varies from mission to mission depending on various factors - such as the amount of link margin designed into the communications system, and the minimum data rate that is acceptable from a mission standpoint. In reality most missions at Mars have had communications blackout periods of the order of a month.[25]

A satellite at either of the Earth-Sun Predefinição:L4/Predefinição:L5 Lagrange points could serve as a relay during this period to solve the problem; even a constellation of communications satellites would be a minor expense in the context of a full colonization program. However, the size and power of the equipment needed for these distances make the L4 and L5 locations unrealistic for relay stations, and the inherent stability of these regions, while beneficial in terms of station-keeping, also attracts dust and asteroids, which could pose a risk.[26] Despite that concern, the STEREO probes passed through the L4 and L5 regions without damage in late 2009.

Recent work by the University of Strathclyde's Advanced Space Concepts Laboratory, in collaboration with the European Space Agency, has suggested an alternative relay architecture based on highly non-Keplerian orbits. These are a special kind of orbit produced when continuous low-thrust propulsion, such as that produced from an ion engine or solar sail, modifies the natural trajectory of a spacecraft. Such an orbit would enable continuous communications during solar conjunction by allowing a relay spacecraft to "hover" above Mars, out of the orbital plane of the two planets.[27] Such a relay avoids the problems of satellites stationed at either L4 or L5 by being significantly closer to the surface of Mars while still maintaining continuous communication between the two planets.

Robotic precursors editar

The path to a human colony could be prepared by robotic systems such as the Mars Exploration Rovers Spirit, Opportunity and Curiosity. These systems could help locate resources, such as ground water or ice, that would help a colony grow and thrive. The lifetimes of these systems would be measured in years and even decades, and as recent developments in commercial spaceflight have shown, it may be that these systems will involve private as well as government ownership. These robotic systems also have a reduced cost compared with early crewed operations, and have less political risk.

Wired systems might lay the groundwork for early crewed landings and bases, by producing various consumables including fuel, oxidizers, water, and construction materials. Establishing power, communications, shelter, heating, and manufacturing basics can begin with robotic systems, if only as a prelude to crewed operations.

Mars Surveyor 2001 Lander MIP (Mars ISPP Precursor) was to demonstrate manufacture of oxygen from the atmosphere of Mars,[28] and test solar cell technologies and methods of mitigating the effect of Martian dust on the power systems.[29]

Early human missions editar

In 1948, Wernher von Braun described in his book The Mars Project that a fleet of 10 spaceships could be built using 1000 three-stage rockets. These could bring a population of 70 people to Mars.

Early real-life human missions to Mars however, such as those being tentatively planned by NASA, FKA and ESA would not be direct precursors to colonization. They are intended solely as exploration missions, as the Apollo missions to the Moon were not planned to be sites of a permanent base.

Colonization requires the establishment of permanent bases that have potential for self-expansion. A famous proposal for building such bases is the Mars Direct and the Semi-Direct plans, advocated by Robert Zubrin.[18]

Other proposals that envision the creation of a settlement, yet no return flight for the humans embarking on the journey have come from Jim McLane and Bas Lansdorp (the man behind Mars One).[30]

The Mars Society has established the Mars Analogue Research Station Programme at sites Devon Island in Canada and in Utah, United States, to experiment with different plans for human operations on Mars, based on Mars Direct. Modern Martian architecture concepts often include facilities to produce oxygen and propellant on the surface of the planet.

Economics editar

 
Iron-nickel meteorite found on Mars' surface

As with early colonies in the New World, economics would be a crucial aspect to a colony's success. The reduced gravity well of Mars and its position in the Solar System may facilitate Mars-Earth trade and may provide an economic rationale for continued settlement of the planet. Given its size and resources, this might eventually be a place to grow food and produce equipment that would be used by miners in the asteroid belt.

Mars' reduced gravity together with its rotation rate makes it possible for the construction of a space elevator with today's materials,{{carece de fontes}} although the low orbit of Phobos could present engineering challenges. If constructed, the elevator could transport minerals and other natural resources extracted from the planet.

A major economic problem is the enormous up-front investment required to establish the colony and perhaps also terraform the planet.

Some early Mars colonies might specialize in developing local resources for Martian consumption, such as water and/or ice. Local resources can also be used in infrastructure construction.[31] One source of Martian ore currently known to be available is reduced iron in the form of nickel-iron meteorites. Iron in this form is more easily extracted than from the iron oxides that cover the planet.

Another main inter-Martian trade good during early colonization could be manure.[32] Assuming that life doesn't exist on Mars, the soil is going to be very poor for growing plants, so manure and other fertilizers will be valued highly in any Martian civilization until the planet changes enough chemically to support growing vegetation on its own.

Solar power is a candidate for power for a Martian colony. Solar insolation (the amount of solar radiation that reaches Mars) is about 42% of that on Earth, since Mars is about 52% farther from the Sun and insolation falls off as the square of distance. But the thin atmosphere would allow almost all of that energy to reach the surface as compared to Earth, where the atmosphere absorbs roughly a quarter of the solar radiation. Sunlight on the surface of Mars would be much like a moderately cloudy day on Earth.[33]

Nuclear power is also a good candidate, since the fuel is very dense for cheap transportation from Earth. Nuclear power also produces heat, which would be extremely valuable to a Mars colony.

Possible locations for settlements editar

Broad regions of Mars can be considered for possible settlement sites.

Polar regions editar

Mars' north and south poles once attracted great interest as settlement sites because seasonally-varying polar ice caps have long been observed by telescope from Earth. Mars Odyssey found the largest concentration of water near the north pole, but also showed that water likely exists in lower latitudes as well, making the poles less compelling as a settlement locale. Like Earth, Mars sees a midnight sun at the poles during local summer and polar night during local winter.

Equatorial regions editar

Mars Odyssey found what appear to be natural caves near the volcano Arsia Mons. It has been speculated that settlers could benefit from the shelter that these or similar structures could provide from radiation and micrometeoroids. Geothermal energy is also suspected in the equatorial regions.[34]

Midlands editar

 
Eagle Crater, as seen from Opportunity (2004)

The exploration of Mars' surface is still underway. The two Mars Exploration Rovers, Spirit and Opportunity, have encountered very different soil and rock characteristics. This suggests that the Martian landscape is quite varied and the ideal location for a settlement would be better determined when more data becomes available. As on Earth, seasonal variations in climate become greater with distance from the equator.

Valles Marineris editar

Valles Marineris, the "Grand Canyon" of Mars, is over 3,000 km long and averages 8 km deep. Atmospheric pressure at the bottom would be some 25% higher than the surface average, 0.9 kPa vs 0.7 kPa. River channels lead to the canyon, indicating it was once flooded.

Lava tubes editar

Several lava tube skylights on Mars have been located. Earth based examples indicate that some should have lengthy passages offering complete protection from radiation and be relatively easy to seal using on site materials, especially in small subsections.[35]

Advocacy editar

Making Mars colonization a reality is advocated by several groups with different reasons and proposals. One of the oldest is the Mars Society. They promote a NASA program to accomplish human exploration of Mars and have set up Mars analog research stations in Canada and the United States. Also are MarsDrive, which is dedicated to private initiatives for the exploration and settlement of Mars, and, Mars to Stay, which advocates recycling emergency return vehicles into permanent settlements as soon as initial explorers determine permanent habitation is possible. An initiative that went public in June 2012 is Mars One. Its aim is to establish a fully operational permanent human colony on Mars by 2023.[36]

In fiction editar

 Ver artigo principal: Mars in fiction

A few instances in fiction provide detailed descriptions of Mars colonization. They include:

See also editar

References editar

Predefinição:Cleanup-bare URLs

  1. House Science Committee Hearing Charter: Lunar Science & Resources: Future Options | SpaceRef — Space News as it Happens
  2. «Space Race Rekindled? Russia Shoots for Moon, Mars». ABC News. 2 de setembro de 2007. Consultado em 2 de setembro de 2007 
  3. ORACLE-ThinkQuest
  4. Gravity Hurts (so Good) - NASA 2001
  5. Hamilton, Calvin. «Mars Introduction» 
  6. Elert, Glenn. «Temperature on the Surface of Mars» 
  7. Technological Requirements for Terraforming Mars
  8. Baldwin, Emily (26 April 2012). «Lichen survives harsh Mars environment». Skymania News. Consultado em 27 April 2012  Verifique data em: |acessodata=, |data= (ajuda)
  9. de Vera, J.-P.; Kohler, Ulrich (26 April 2012). «The adaptation potential of extremophiles to Martian surface conditions and its implication for the habitability of Mars» (PDF). European Geosciences Union. Consultado em 27 April 2012  Verifique data em: |acessodata=, |data= (ajuda)
  10. Surviving the conditions on Mars - DLR
  11. MARIE reports and data
  12. bnl.gov
  13. Zubrin, Robert (1996). The Case for Mars: The Plan to Settle the Red Planet and Why We Must. [S.l.]: Touchstone. pp. 114–116. ISBN 0-684-83550-9 
  14. a b c Space Radiation Hinders NASA’s Mars Ambitions.
  15. «Flight to Mars: How Long? And along what path?». Phy6.org. Consultado em 1 de agosto de 2013 
  16. NASA Tech Briefs - Variable-Specific-Impulse Magnetoplasma Rocket
  17. Ion engine could one day power 39-day trips to Mars
  18. a b Zubrin, Robert (1996). The Case for Mars: The Plan to Settle the Red Planet and Why We Must. [S.l.]: Touchstone. ISBN 0-684-83550-9 
  19. NASA: Space radiation between Earth and Mars poses a hazard to astronauts.
  20. Dr. David R. Williams (2004-09-01 (last updated)). «Mars Fact Sheet». NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. Consultado em 18 de setembro de 2007  Verifique data em: |data= (ajuda)
  21. Nancy Atkinson (17 de julho de 2007). «The Mars Landing Approach: Getting Large Payloads to the Surface of the Red Planet». Consultado em 18 de setembro de 2007 
  22. This is from an archived version of the web: The Space Elevator - Chapters 2 & 7 http://web.archive.org/web/20050603001216/www.isr.us/Downloads/niac_pdf/chapter2.html
  23. Space Colonization Using Space-Elevators from Phobos Leonard M. Weinstein
  24. marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov
  25. Gangale, T. (2005). «MarsSat: Assured Communication with Mars». Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1065: 296–310. PMID 16510416. doi:10.1196/annals.1370.007 
  26. http://www.stk.com/downloads/resources/user-resources/downloads/whitepapers/0201_sun_mars_lib_pts.pdf
  27. «A Novel Interplanetary Communications Relay» (PDF). Consultado em February 14, 2011  Verifique data em: |acessodata= (ajuda)
  28. D. Kaplan et al., THE MARS IN-SITU-PROPELLANT-PRODUCTION PRECURSOR (MIP) FLIGHT DEMONSTRATION, paper presented at Mars 2001: Integrated Science in Preparation for Sample Return and Human Exploration, Lunar and Planetary Institute, Oct. 2-4 1999, Houston, TX.
  29. G. A. Landis, P. Jenkins, D. Scheiman, and C. Baraona, "MATE and DART: An Instrument Package for Characterizing Solar Energy and Atmospheric Dust on Mars", presented at Concepts and Approaches for Mars Exploration, July 18–20, 2000 Houston, Texas.
  30. NWT magazine, august 2012
  31. Landis, Geoffrey A. (2009). «Meteoritic steel as a construction resource on Mars». Acta Astronautica. 64 (2–3): 183. doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2008.07.011 
  32. Lovelock, James and Allaby, Michael, "The Greening of Mars" 1984
  33. «Effect of Clouds and Pollution on Insolation». Consultado em 4 de outubro de 2012 
  34. Fogg, Martyn J. (1997). «The utility of geothermal energy on Mars» (PDF). Journal of the British Interplanetary Society. 49: 403–22. Bibcode:1997JBIS...50..187F 
  35. G. E. Cushing, T. N. Titus, J. J. Wynne1, P. R. Christensen. «THEMIS Observes Possible Cave Skylights on Mars» (PDF). Consultado em June 18, 2010  Verifique data em: |acessodata= (ajuda)
  36. http://mars-one.com/ Mars One - Initiative for establishing a fully operational permanent human colony on Mars by 2023.

Further reading editar

 
O Commons possui uma categoria com imagens e outros ficheiros sobre Eduardo P/Oficina de tradução/4

External links editar

 
Wikilivros
O Wikilivros tem um livro chamado Colonising Mars